Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-31

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 5483 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 5483 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 5483 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 5483 of 2026 Ravi And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishi Kesh Malviya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State-respondent. 2. The present application has been preferred challenging chargesheet dated 29.01.2024, cognizance/summoning order dated 07.06.2024 along with entire proceedings of Case No.820 of 2024 (State of U.P. Vs. Ravi and Others) arising out of Case Crime No.752 of 2023, under Section 427, 147, 149, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Sikandra Rao, District- Hathras, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, Sikandra Rao, District- Hathras. 3. Learned counsel for applicants argued that applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass them since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by them. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicants that applicants have no role in the alleged incident and they have been implicated in this case only on account of some

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 5483 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam