Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-30

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 4663 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 4663 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 4663 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 4663 of 2026 Rajan Rohtagi .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aklank Kumar Jain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sanjay Agrawal, G.A. Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned counsel for opposite party no.2; learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. Instant application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 26.11.2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.2, Rampur in Complaint No.319 of 2025 (Ruchi Vs. Sri Rajan Rohtagi) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station Civil Lines, District Rampur. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that instant proceedings under Section 138 N.I. Act is malicious. It is alleged in the complaint that applicant had given bearer cheque to opposite party no.2. The opposite party no.2 put the signature on the back of the cheque in presence of the applicant and signature of the opposite party no.2 has been verified by the applicant. When the opposite part

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 4663 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam