Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-28

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 12442 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 12442 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 12442 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 12442 of 2026 Sanjeev Kumar Muarya @ Sanjeev Kumar And Another .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Bhushan Paul, Saurabh Paul Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of entire proceeding of Case no.814 of 2024 (State vs. Sanjeev Kumar Maurya & Others), arising out of Case Crime No.0728 of 2023, under Sections 406, 420 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Baradari, District- Bareilly as well as charge-sheet No.16 of 2024, dated 08.01.2024 and summoning order dated 03.04.2024, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.1, Bareilly, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.1, Bareilly. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicants has challenged the impugned charge sheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 12442 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam