Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-25

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11834 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11834 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11834 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11834 of 2026 Sandeep Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Singh, Shivam Singh, Vishal Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 31.5.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur as well as charge sheet dated 17.3.2025 submitted in Case no. 230 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime no. 372 of 2023 under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC, PS- Shahganj, District Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another reporte

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11834 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam