Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-20

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11099 of 2026 Shri Chitransh Construction Babina Through Proprietor Rajeev Khare .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 15.05.2025 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division) Court no. 1/Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi in Complaint Case No.14513 of 2025 (M/s Kumar Traders Babina through Proprietor Shiv Kumar Gupta Vs. Shri Chitransh Construction Babina through Proprietor Rajeev Khare) under section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Babina, District Jhansi. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that there is money dispute between the parties and opposite party no.2 has filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act against the applicant. It is further submitted that since there is some dispute regarding payment of money and as such, there is a good chance of am

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11099 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam