Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-19

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11016 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11016 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11016 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11016 of 2026 Jugnu .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devi Dayal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. Instant application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 11007 of 2016 (Satya Prakash vs. Jugnu), under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Agra, pending in the Court of A.C.-1st, Agra. 3. The facts of the case is that the complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act has been lodged by the opposite party no. 2 against the applicant in the court of Additional Judicial Magistrate-V, Agra. After recording statement of complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and taking documentary evidence, the judicial magistrate summoned the applicant under Section 138 N.I. Act. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. The applicant has not received any summon or notice sent by the court concerned due to Covid-19 pand

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11016 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam