Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-19

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10908 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10908 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10908 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 10908 of 2026 The Health Equipment Proprietor Suraj Shukla .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar, Hari Om Sharma, Ranjit Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 24.10.2024 and bailable warrant dated 08.01.2026 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Court No.2. in Complaint Case No.11287 of 2024 (Pratik Kumar Katiyar Vs. the health equipment Proprietor Suraj Shukla), Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station- Bilhaur, District- Kanpur Dehat, pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate Court No.2. Kanpur Dehat. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that there is money dispute between the parties and opposite party no.2 has filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act against the applicant. It is further submitted that since there is some dispute regarding payment of money and a

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10908 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam