Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-18

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10849 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10849 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10849 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 10849 of 2026 Ravi Pratap Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Pravesh Yadav, Shashank Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 78 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Ram Pravesh Yadav, learned counsel for the accused/applicant appears and submits that the FIR of rape on false promise of marriage has been lodged by the opposite party no.2 (victim). The relation between the two was consensual in nature, as the accused/applicant and victim were adult. He submits that the presently accused/applicant and victim have entered into compromise. Both of them have married separately. The text of compromise are in page no. 48 to 54 of the application, he seeks interference of this Court to quash the charge sheet and proceedings. 2. Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 appears and hands up the Vakalatnama, the same is taken on record. He admits the factum of separate marriage of accused/applicant and victim and compromise entered into between the parties. 3. Learned AGA for the State submits no objection if the

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10849 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam