Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-18

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10806 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10806 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10806 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 10806 of 2026 Vijay Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Puneet Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajesh Sharma Court No. - 78 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Puneet Srivastava, learned counsel for the accused/applicant appears and submits that the FIR of enticement has been lodged by the brother of victim against the accused/applicant. The accused/applicant and victim have married as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Presently the accused/applicant and victim are having a child. The trial is continuing and all the evidences are in his favour. He further submits that the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 CrPC also was in favour of the accused/applicant despite that the accused was charge sheeted. He submits that the accused/applicant, victim and informant have entered into compromise. Hence, he seeks interference of this Court. 2. Sri Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 (informant and victim) appears and admits the factum of marriage and compromise entered into between the parties. 3. Le

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10806 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam