Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-18

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1019 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1019 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1019 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1019 of 2026 Uday Pratap Gupta .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manvendra Narain Pathak, Shiv Lal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the judgment and order dated 19.09.2025 as well as summoning order dated 21.09.2022 (Annexure No.-7 &4) passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.10, Prayagraj in Complaint No. 1436 of 2022 (Manoj Kumar Singh Vs. Uday Pratap Gupta) under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station- Meja, District-Prayagraj. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that there is money dispute between the parties and opposite party no.2 has filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act against the applicant. It is further submitted that since there is some dispute regarding payment of money and as such, there is a good chance of amicable settlement of dispute through compromise. 4. Learned counsel for applicant

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1019 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam