Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-26

APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE No. 73 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE No. 73 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE No. 73 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 378 DEFECTIVE No. - 73 of 2025 State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Applicant(s) Versus Ram Lakhan .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : G.A. Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Nijam Ahamad Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Order on C.M. Application No.1 of 2025 : Application for condonation of delay 1. Heard learned A.G.A. for the State/applicant and Sri Nijam Ahamad, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay. 3. Office has reported delay of 188 days in filing of the appeal. 4. Learned A.G.A. submits that delay in filing the appeal is procedural and not intentional or deliberate. He further submits that the delay is on account of administrative procedure required to be followed for filing of the appeal. Thus, he prays for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed the submissions of learned A.G.A. He submits that there is no proper explanation for condonation of delay of 188 days in filing of the appeal what to say of sufficient explanation. He further submits th

APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE No. 73 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam