Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-10

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 6 of 2026 The State of Uttar Pradesh and another .....Appellant(s) Versus Ajay Chaudhery .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajiv Singh (S.C.) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Deepak Singh, Jitendra Singh, Sumit Goyal Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. The appeal is barred by 24 days. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed seeking condonation of delay. Though the reply contesting the application and rejoinder thereof have been filed, the application has not been seriously opposed and the matter has been argued on merits. 2. Looking to the cause indicated in the application seeking condonation of delay, the same is found to be sufficient and, therefore, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘the Act’) is directed against judgement dated 20.09.2025 passed by the Commercial Court No. 1, Meerut, whereby the application filed by the appellants under Section 34 of the

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. 6 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam