Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-03-24

ANIL YADAV vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-967/2024 2026:DHC:2446
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ANIL YADAV
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 967/2024 ANIL YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibek Tripathi and Mr. Ajay Kr. Srivastava, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with Inspector Bhoopender Kumar and SI Sweety Malik, PS Paharganj. Ms. Astha, DHCLSC (through videoconferencing) and Ms. Megha Singh, Advocate for prosecutrix. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 394/2021 of PS Paharganj for offence under Section 366/323/342/376(3) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. 1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 18.03.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. BAIL APPLN. 967/2024 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Sweety Malik. I have also heard learned counsel for prosecutrix. 3. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is that the