ANIL KUMAR WADHWA vs M/S M2M BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 + ARB.P. 149/2025 ANIL KUMAR WADHWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Bansal, Advocate versus M/S M2M BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Nayyar, Advocate for R-2 & 7. Mr. Vijay Kasana, Advocate for R-5 & 8. 2 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 72/2024 ANIL KUMAR WADHWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Bansal, Advocate versus M2M BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Nayyar, Advocate for R-2 & 7. Mr. Vijay Kasana, Advocate for R-5 & 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ARB.P. 149/2025 & conncected matter Page 1 of 10 By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:11.03.2026 16:51:38 HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. ARB.P. 149/2025 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in terms of Clause 8 of the Memorandum of Understanding cum Agreement dated 02.02.20222. The said clause is set out herein below: “8.0 Arbitration: All matters, disputes, differences or claims arising between the parties as to effect interpretation of the Agreement, or as to their rights, duties or abilities thereunder or as to any act, matter or thing arising out of, implementation or interpretation of the agreement. consequent to or in connection with the present Agreement or as to the validity of the Agreement shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and all amendments from time to time. (a) That Parties will appoint Sole Arbitrator mutually nominated and named who will be either retired District Judge or High Court Judge. Any party