1 SHADAB YUSUF MUKADAM vs MOHAMMED ALI MOHAMMED SALIH

Judgment text excerpt

Judgment-CARBP-3903-23+5353 - FINAL.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CHAITANYA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ASHOK JADHAV Digitally signed by CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date: 2026.03.05 IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION 18:41:17 +0530 COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 3903 OF 2023 Mohammed Ali M. Sali (since deceased) Through Legal Heirs (a) Fatima Nalakath Sahusintavide & Ors. …Petitioners Versus Rajaram Chavan Real Estate Private Limited …Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 4575 OF 2023 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 3903 OF 2023 ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 5353 OF 2023 Shadab Y. Mukadam …Petitioner Versus Mohammed Ali M. Sali (since deceased) Through Legal Heirs (a) Fatima Nalakath Sahusintavide & Ors. …Respondents Mr. E.A. Sasi a/w. Tejas Shinde, for Petitioner in CARBPL/3903/2023. Mr. Mutahhar Khan i/b. Lokesh Zade for Petitioners in CARBPL/5353/2023. Mr. Simil Purohit, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Rishikesh Soni i/b. Ashok Purohit & Co., for Respondent No.2 Page 1 of 56 March 5, 2026 Chaitanya Judgment-CARBP-3903-23+5353 - FINAL.doc CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. RESERVED ON : JANUARY 17, 2026. PRONOUNCED ON : MARCH 5, 2026. JUDGEMENT : 1. The Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 3903 of 2023 is a Petition filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”), challenging orders passed by the Learned Arbitral Tribunal on February 14, 2019 (“First Impugned Order”) and December 15, 2022 (“Second Impugned Order”), under Section 17 of the Act (collectively, “Impugned Orders”). This Petition is filed by the legal heirs of the original Petitioner (“Owner”), late Mohammed Ali M. Sali, who are aggrieved by the Learned Arbitral Tribunal refusing to hand over the possession of 16 flats de