Bombay High Court · 2026-06-18
Wadhwa Estates and Developers India Pvt Ltd vs Moon Craft Apartments CHSL
- Citation / case number
- CARBPL/13424/2026
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- Wadhwa Estates and Developers India Pvt Ltd
- Respondent
- Moon Craft Apartments CHSL
Judgment text excerpt
carbpl13424-2026-J-Final.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.13424 OF 2026 ATUL GANESH Wadhwa Estates and Developers KULKARNI Digitally signed by (India) Private Limited … Petitioner ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2026.06.18 17:43:07 +0530 Vs. 1. Moon Craft Apartments Coop. Housing Society Limited 2. Sajida Ul Haq 3. Muthar Shaikh 4. Maryana Ratus 5. Sofia Shaikh 6. Imtiaz Ahmed 7. Seema Ashok 8. Afzal Ahmed 9. Sabeena Ahmed 10. Imtiaz Ahmed 11. Sabeena Ahmed … Respondents Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr. Tushar Guujar and Mr. Deep Madnani i/by SL Partners for the petitioner. Mr. Shanay Shah with Mr. J.R. Vakil i/by J.R. Vakil & Associates for respondent No.1. Mr. Aurelius D’Silva with Ms. Reema Maurya i/by D’Silva & Co., for respondent No.2. Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud with Mr. Altaf Khan, Mr. Akash Mangalgi and Mr. Janay Jain for respondent No.3. 1 carbpl13424-2026-J-Final.doc Mr. Aniesh Jadhav i/by Mr. Shubham Choudhari for respondent No.4. Mr. Nikhil Adkine with Mr. Avinash Bailmare for respondent No.5. Mr. Amrut Joshi i/by Mr. Nikhil Adkine for respondent Nos.6 to 11. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. RESERVED ON : JUNE 11, 2026. PRONOUNCED ON : JUNE 18, 2026 JUDGMENT: 1. By filing the present arbitration petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction against respondent Nos. 2 to 11, who are stated to be dissenting members, to vacate their respective flats situated in respondent No.1 society, namely Moon Craft Apartments Cooperative Housing Society Limited, located at Plot No.1485/1487, Shirley Rajan Road, Off Carter Road, Bandra (West), Mumbai 400 050. 2. The facts which led to the filing of the present arbitration petition, as stated in the petition, are that respondent N