VIKRAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRM-M-34782-2026 Date of Decision :26.06.2026 Vikram ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Bhavya Vats, Advocate for complainant. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed for the grant of benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in respect of FIR No.323 dated 09.06.2026 registered under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal (Annexure P/1). 2. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has already been arrested. 3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to avail an appropriate remedy. 3. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE June 26, 2026 aarti Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2026.06.26 16:29 I attest to the accurac