Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-23

SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 33990/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CRM-M-33990-2026 Date of Decision: 23.06.2026 SUNIL KUMAR ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA .…Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Singh Jattan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwell, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rajinder K. Singal, Advocate for the complainant. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition preferred under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the ‘BNSS’) is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.80 dated 09.04.2026 registered under Sections 310 (4), 310 (2) of BNS (the offence under Section 238 of BNS added subsequently in the FIR) at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala. 2. On a complaint having been submitted by one Avinash Verma, the FIR in question was registered, the contents of which are as under:- “To Station House Officer, Police Station Mullana. Subject- Regarding the assault on the applicant by the accused Rohit, Sunil, Himanshu. Ajay and 2/3 of their other associates and robbing the applicant of Rs.5 lakh. Sir, it is requested that I, Avinash Verma, son of Sanjeev Kumar Verma, res