SMT. REETIKA vs SH. RAJINDER KUMAR JINDAL & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~SB-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.06.2026 + CM(M) 1306/2026 & CM APPL. 38826/2026 SMT. REETIKA …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikko, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Chadha, Mr. Sagar Aggarwal and Ms. Anjali Jain, Advocates. Versus SH. RAJINDER KUMAR JINDAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Ms. Garima Verma, Mr. Aarya Kumar Jha and Ms. Parul Shrivas, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA TEJAS KARIA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 38824/2026 & CM APPL. 38825/2026 (Exemptions) 1. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Applications stand disposed of. CM(M) 1306/2026 3. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 09.06.2026 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-02, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (“Family Court”) in Misc. DJ No. 241/2026 (“Application”) arising out of Guardianship Petition being GP No. 198/2016 titled as ‘Rajinder Kr. Jindal v. Reetika’ (“GP”). Signature Not Verified Signed By:NEELAM CM(M) 1306/2026 Page 1 of 4 SHARMA Signing Date:16.06.2026 21:06:18 4. The Respondents are the paternal grandparents of the 17 years old minor child and had instituted GP seeking custody and guardianship of the minor child, who has since infancy remained in the care, custody and guardianship of her biological mother, the Petitioner. 5. Vide judgment dated 27.09.2025 passed in GP, the learned Family Court granted the Respondents to a single, carefully supervised meeting with the minor child, along with a direction to deposit ₹52 lakhs which admittedly belonged to the minor child. 6. The Petitioner preferred an Appeal challenging the Judgment dated 27.09.2025 passed in GP