SHALU vs MEERA BATRA AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 12th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 05th June, 2026 + RSA 22/2022, CM APPL. 9470-9471/2022 & 40208/2024 SHALU W/o Sh. Munish Kumar Lakhina R/o 2A/44, Ground Floor, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi. ....Appellant Through: Mr. Mohammad Sajid and Mr. Abdullah Bin Masood, Advocates with Appellant in person. versus 1. MEERA BATRA W/o Shyam Batra R/o 9/117, Second Floor, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi. 2. MUNISH KUMAR LAKHINA S/o Late Sh. Wazirchand R/o 2A/44, Ground Floor, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Pulak Gupta Joshi and Ms. Payal Rajput, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant/Defendant No.2, against the Judgment dated 22.11.2021, whereby the learned ADJ has upheld the Judgment of learned Civil Judge dated 18.11.2020 decreeing the Suit for Permanent Injunction in favour of RFA 22/2022 Page 1 of 14 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:08.06.2026 13:56:56 the Plaintiff, thereby directing the Defendants to handover the vacant and peaceful possession of the Suit property to the Plaintiff and also restrained the Defendants for creating third party interest, in the Suit property. 2. The Plaintiff/Respondent, Meera Batra filed a Suit No.609518/2016 for Mandatory Injunction against the Defendants/Appellants directing them to remove their belongings from the Suit property and to hand over the Possession and for Permanent Injunction for restraining them from creating third party interest. 3. The facts in brief are that the Plaintiff/Respondent No.1, Smt. Meer