Gujarat High Court · 2026-06-09
SCA/1185/2024
- Citation / case number
- 2026:GUJHC:34309
- Court
- Gujarat High Court
- Petitioner
- SCA/1185/2024
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1185/2024 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026 2026:GUJHC:34309 IN THE HIGH Court OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1185 of 2024 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI ================================================================ Approved for Reporting Yes No ================================================================ GOPALBHAI VITTHALBHAI TADVI Versus BANK OF INDIA ================================================================ Appearance: MR HEMAL K ACHARYA(6021) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR NANDISH Y CHUDGAR(2011) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI Date : 09/06/2026 JUDGMENT 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Nandish Chudgar waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent. 2. With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing today. Page 1 of 8 Uploaded by () on Downloaded on : Tue Jun 30 23:47:54 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1185/2024 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026 2026:GUJHC:34309 3. Heard learned advocate Mr. Hemal K. Acharya for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Nandish Chudgar for the respondent. Perused the record. 4. By way of this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ / order by directing the respondent bank to act as per letter dated 30.8.2014 and further to act as per paragraph No.4 of the order passed by the learned CGIT cum Labour Court, Ahmedabad in CGITA Case No.118 of 2006. 5. Learned advocate for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner's father was working as a Watchman cum Water Pump man at th