SAMAIRA MITTAL vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY

CWP-19357-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (217) CWP-19357-2026 Date of Decision : 25.06.2026 Samaira Mittal …Petitioner Versus Union of India through Secretary ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.1-Union of India. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3-CBSE. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed as after correction in her marks, the result has been uploaded on the CBSE website, and therefore, the prayer made in the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. He further submits that the petitioner has applied to a university situated at Singapore. However, her claim was rejected as she did not acquire the requisite marks, at that time. Now, the respondent-CBSE, after re-chekcing the petitioner’s marks sheet, has uploaded fresh result on the CBSE website, which reflects that the petitioner has obtained more than 96% marks. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a prayer that in case, the r