SAHIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-34835-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CRM-M-34835-2026 Date of Decision :26.06.2026 Sahil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Nitin Bhanwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev. Addl. A.G. Haryana. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’) for the grant of benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in respect of FIR No.0313 dated 04.11.2024 registered under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Barauda, District Sonepat (Annexure P/1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations alleged against the petitioner is of creating an account on Instagram and reflecting an illegal weapon on the same is incorrect as the said account was created when the petitioner was in judicial custody and hence, recovery of said illegal weapon being attributed to the petitioner for which custodial interrogation of the petitioner is sought, has not been appreciated correctly by the trial Court while dismiss