RITIKA AND ANOTEHR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP-7523-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CRWP-7523-2026 Date of decision : 25.06.2026 Ritika and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Sandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner No.1 was born on 13.10.2006 and petitioner No.2 was born on 06.01.2007. Reliance has been placed upon the Aadhar card (Annexures P-1 and P-2). It is submitted that petitioner No.2 is although major but is not of marriageable age. It is the case of the petitioners that they are unmarried and DAVINDER KUMAR are living in a “Live in Relationship” out of their free will and without any 2026.06.25 17:35 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CRWP-7523-2026 2 pressure. It is further submitted that the petitioners have given a detailed representation dated 23.06.2