Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-06-08

RANGNATH SHIVRAM MEDANKAR vs MARUTI DYANOBA MEDANKAR

Citation / case number
SA/234/2002
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
RANGNATH SHIVRAM MEDANKAR
Respondent
MARUTI DYANOBA MEDANKAR

Judgment text excerpt

4-sa-234-2002.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 234 OF 2002 varsha Rangnath Shivram Medankar ] (since deceased), Residing at Chakan ] (Modankar Vasti) Taluka: Khed, ] District- Pune. ] 1a) Dattatray Rangnath Medankar ] R/at: Chakan (Medankar Vasti) ] Tal: Khed, District Pune. ] 1b) Subhash Rangnath Medankar ] R/at: Chakan (Medankar Vasti) ] Tal: Khed, District Pune. ] 1c) Laxman Rangnath Medankar ] R/at: Chakan (Medankar Vasti) ] Digitally Tal: Khed, District Pune. ] signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY 1d) Vilas Rangnath Medankar ] VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date: 2026.06.08 18:25:20 R/at: Chakan (Medankar Vasti) ] +0530 Tal: Khed, District Pune. ] 1e) Sushila Abasaheb Murhe ] R/at: Post Kurali(Murhe Wasti) ] Tal: Khed, District Pune. ] … Appellant (Orig. Plaintiff) V/s. Maruti Dyanoba Medankar, ] Residing at Chakan(Medankar Vasti), ] Taluka: Khed, District : Pune. ] … Respondent (Orig. Defendant) WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 14691 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 234 OF 2002 1) Rangnath Shivram Medankar ] since deceased through legal heirs ]… Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Rangnath Shivram Medankar ] (since deceased) through Legal Heirs ] … Appellant V/s. Maruti Dyanoba Medankar, ] … Respondent 1/34 4-sa-234-2002.doc Mr. Drupad S. Patil a/w. Mr. Namitkumar S. Pansare for the Appellant. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar a/w. Mr. Sandesh More, Mr. Satish Aher, Mr. Hitendra Gandhi, Mr. Om. Gandhi, Mr. Akash Jawale for the Respondent. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. RESERVED ON : 5th FEBRUARY 2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 8th JUNE 2026 JUDGMENT: 1) This second appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff to challenge the concurrent judgments and decrees dismissing his suit. During the pendency of this appeal, the original plaintiff expired, and his heir

RANGNATH SHIVRAM MEDANKAR vs MARUTI DYANOBA MEDANKAR · Niyam