RAJ MAHENDRABHAI CHAUHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CRM-M-33644-2026 Date of decision:30.06.2026 RAJ MAHENDRABHAI CHAUHAN ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Varun Gupta, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Hitesh Chauhan, Advocate for complainant. *** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) by petitioner for grant of concession of regular bail in FIR No.33 dated 25.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 420, 120B of Indian Penal Code [corresponding to Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita] at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Rewari. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner neither induced the complainant to invest money nor was beneficiary of money allegedly paid by complainant. It is further submitted that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in jail as challan has already been filed and trial is likely to take time. 3. It is further submitted that matter stands compromised between the petitioner and the complainant