Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-30

RADHIKA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRWP 7600/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RADHIKA AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRWP-7600-2026 Date of decision :30.06.2026 RADHIKA AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are seeking protection of their lives and liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Service of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with as no adverse order is passed against them. 4. As per petition and documents enclosed therewith i.e. Aadhar Card issued by the Government of India, petitioner No.1-Radhika is aged 20 years and petitioner No.2- Amarjeet Singh is aged 32 years. The petitioners are MANOJ KUMAR residing with each other after the marriage which is solemnized on 24.06.2026 2026.06.30 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this docume