PUSHPA OMKAR DUSANE and ORS. vs VIJAY VITTHAL DUSANE

Judgment text excerpt

2-SA-1391-2004.docx Swapnil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 1391 OF 2004 1. Pushpa Omkar Dusane Age 48 yrs, Occ : Household, R/o. Government Quarters. 2. Alka Abhimanyu Ghodake Age 28 Yrs, Occ : Household, R/o. Hundiwala Lane, Nashik. 3. Durga Omkar Dsane Age 24 Yrs. 4. Nalini Bharat Ahirrao Age 27 Yrs, Occ : Household, R/o. Devkinandan Society, Kamthwade, Nashik. 5. Santosh Omkar Dusane, Age 22 Yrs. 6. Rohini Omkar Dusane, Age 19 Yrs, All R/o. Golf Club, Behind 3 Bunglow Near LIC Office, Nashik. ...Appellants (Org. Plaintiffs) VERSUS 1/26 2-SA-1391-2004.docx Vijay Vitthal Dusane Age : Major, Occ : Service, R/o. H.No.27, Devkinand Co-op. Society, Kamathwade, Nashik. ...Respondent (Original Defendant) Mr. B. K. Barve a/w. Mr. Sandeep Barve, Ms. Sonali Patil, Ms. Diksha Gaikwad and Ms. Simmy Sebastian i/b. B. K. Barve and Co. for the appellants. Mr. Sanjay P. Shinde a/w. Mr. Prathmesh T. B. for the respondent. CORAM : GAURI GODSE J RESERVED ON: 29th JANUARY 2026 PRONOUNCED ON: 8th JUNE 2026 JUDGMENT: 1. This second appeal is preferred by the original plaintiffs to challenge the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate court allowing the respondent’s appeal and setting aside the trial court’s decree in favour of the appellants. The trial court decreed the suit, declaring the agreement dated 19th November 1992 null and void. The respondent was directed to hand over the possession of the suit property to the plaintiffs. 2. The second appeal was admitted on 12 th December 2/26 2-SA-1391-2004.docx 2008 on the following substantial questions of law :- “1. Whether the document at Exh.46 i.e. agreement to sale allegedly executed by the husband of the present appellant no.1 in favour of the present respondent can be