Delhi High Court · 2026-06-03
PREM SINGH vs C.S. RATHORE
- Citation / case number
- RSA-91/2025 2026:DHC:5084
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- PREM SINGH
- Respondent
- C.S. RATHORE
Judgment text excerpt
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 27th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 03rd June, 2026 + RSA 91/2025 PREM SINGH S/o Late Surjan Singh R/o VPO Chhara, District Jhajjar, Haryana. .....Appellant Through: Mr. B. Anand, Advocate. versus C.S. RATHORE R/o C-34, Ground Floor, Hazara Park, New Delhi. Also at- Chamber No. 181, Block 2 Delhi High Court, New Delhi. .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant, against the common Judgment and Decree dated 22.12.2023 passed by the learned ADJ in RCA DJ Nos. 38/2019, whereby the Counterclaim filed by C.S Rathore seeking recovery of Rs.36,000/- as professional fee which the Ld. Civil Judge on 10.10.2018 which had been dismissed, was decreed. Signature Not Verified RSA 91/2025 Page 1 of 12 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:08.06.2026 13:28:05 2. The Plaintiff/Appellant Prem Singh filed Civil Suit No. 56206/2016 for recovery of Rs. 60,000/- along with interest @24% from 25.04.2011 till its realization, as well as for litigation expenses for an amount of Rs.25,000/- 3. A Counter-Claim No. 08/2017 was also filed by the Defendant/Respondent Mr. C. C. Rathore for recovery of his professional fees for representing the Appellant/plaintiff in two litigations, in the sum of Rs.36,000/-. 4. The facts in brief, as stated in the plaint, was that the Plaintiff/ Appellant was employed with M/s Bass Electric Industry and his services were terminated on 10.10.1993. The plaintiff challenged the Termination Order by way of WP(C) No. 12349/05, before this Court, which was disposed of, vide Or