Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-30

PINKI AND ANOTHER vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRWP 7677/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PINKI AND ANOTHER
Respondent
UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CRWP-7677-2026 Date of decision :30.06.2026 PINKI AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are seeking protection of their lives and liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Service of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with as no adverse order is passed against them. 4. As per petition and documents enclosed therewith i.e. Aadhar Card issued by the Government of India, petitioner No.1-Pinki is aged 34 years and petitioner No.2- Arjun Barodiya is aged 21 years. The petitioners are residing MANOJ KUMAR 2026.06.30 17:02 with each other after the marriage which is solemnized on 28.06.2026 at Prachin I attest