Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-24
NARESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
- Citation / case number
- CRM-M 33825/2026
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- NARESH KUMAR
- Respondent
- STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 CRM-M-33825-2026 Date of Decision : June 24, 2026 NARESH KUMAR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Akash Khurcha, Advocate, for Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., the petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail in Criminal Complaint No. NACT-3890-2023 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, titled “Gaurav Bansal vs. M/s Durga Das Naresh Kumar”. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the trial Court and to remain present on each and every date of hearing. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the trial Court and move an application for bail, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 3. Leave granted. 4. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petition