Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-24

NARESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRM-M 33825/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
NARESH KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102 CRM-M-33825-2026 Date of Decision : June 24, 2026 NARESH KUMAR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Akash Khurcha, Advocate, for Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., the petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail in Criminal Complaint No. NACT-3890-2023 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, titled “Gaurav Bansal vs. M/s Durga Das Naresh Kumar”. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the trial Court and to remain present on each and every date of hearing. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the trial Court and move an application for bail, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 3. Leave granted. 4. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petition