Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

madras High Court · 2026-06-22

Manirathinam vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In

Court
madras High Court
Petitioner
Manirathinam
Respondent
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.6673 of 2026 1.Manirathinam 2.Balamurugan 2.Muthulakshmi 4.Jamunarani 5.Sadayamani ...Petitioners/Accused 1 to 5 Vs 1.State of Tamilnadu rep. by Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Dindigul District. (Cr.No.45 of 2024). ... Complainant/1st Respondent 2.xxxxxxxxx Dindigul District. ...2nd Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records in S.C.No.164 of 2025, on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Dindigul as against the petitioners. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2026 03:28:45 pm ) For Petitioners : Mr.V.Regunathan For R1 : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of Tamilnadu For R2 : Mr.S.R.Krish Aravind ORDER The present petition has been filed by the accused persons in Spl.S.C.No. 164 of 2025, on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Dindigul, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioners are charged with the offences under Sections 9 (r ), 10, 9(i) of POCSO Act r