Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-06-03

M/S AMBER ELECTROTECH LTD. AND ANR vs M/S DOLLAR SECURITY AND SUPPORT SERVICES

Citation / case number
RFA-242/2020 2026:DHC:5052
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S AMBER ELECTROTECH LTD. AND ANR
Respondent
M/S DOLLAR SECURITY AND SUPPORT SERVICES

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 11th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 03rd June 2026 + RFA No. 242/2020, CM APPL. 25169/2020 & CM APPL. 28465/2020 1. M/S AMBER ELECTROTECH LTD. F-3/3, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi-110020. Through its Authorised Representative Mr. Sachin Madaan ….Appellant No.1 2. MR. AMARJEET SINGH Director and Authorised Signatory M/s Amber Electrotech Ltd. F-3/3, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi-110020. ….Appellant No.2 Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam, Mr. Rahul Kumar Jain and Mr. Arshad Jawed, Advocates versus M/S DOLLAR SECURITY & SUPPORT SERVICES RZ-376/21, First Floor, Tughlaqabad Extensions, Kalkaji, New Delhi Presently at: M-47, Ground Floor, Kalkaji, New Delhi Through: Sh. Raj Kumar Dagar, Authorised Representative & General Manager …Respondent Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:RITA SHARMA RFA No. 242/2020 Page 1 of 18 Signing Date:03.06.2026 16:54:59 Through: Mr. Nagendra Kasana, Mr. Sachin Bhati, Ms. Anjana Kasana and Ms. Neeta Kasana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules, 1996, has been filed on behalf of the Appellants against the Judgment dated 26.06.2020, whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff/Respondent for Recovery of Rs.2,91,031/- along with the pendente lite and future interest @12% p.a., has been decreed. 2. The Plaintiff/Respondent had filed a Civil Suit bearing CS DJ No. 207727/2016 for Recovery of Rs.4,02,808/- along with pendente lite and future interest. 3. The facts in brief are that the Plaintiff, a sole-proprietorship concern, was en

M/S AMBER ELECTROTECH LTD. AND ANR vs M/S DOLLAR SECURITY AND SUPPORT SERVICES · Niyam