Delhi High Court · 2026-06-05
KUMAR JAI SINGH vs MRS NEELIMA THAKUR SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED THROUGH HER LRS .
- Citation / case number
- RFA-193/2024 2026:DHC:5072
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- KUMAR JAI SINGH
- Respondent
- MRS NEELIMA THAKUR SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED THROUGH HER LRS .
Judgment text excerpt
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 11thMarch, 2026 Pronounced on: 5th June, 2026 + RFA 193/2024 & CM APPL. 16789/2024 KUMAR JAI SINGH S/o Late Sh. R. P. Singh, R/o Flat No.198, Munirka Enclave,New Delhi. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Seth, Ms. Mahima Chauhan, Ms. Sneha Masani and Mr. Pratham Mehrotr, Advocates. versus MRS. NEELIMA THAKUR Since Deceased Represented through her LRs. (a) Mr. Ajay Thakur S/o Late Sh. H. K. Thakur, R/o C-6/57, Second Floor, Safdarjung Development Area, Delhi. (b) Ms. Bhavna Thakur D/o Sh. Ajay Thakur R/o C-6/57, Second Floor, Safdarjung Development Area, Delhi. ....Respondent Through: Mr. Arunav Patnaik, Ms. Aanchal Tikmani, Mr. Nirbhay Nitya Nanda and Mr. Shiladitya Gopalkrishna, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 („CPC‟) has been filed on behalf of the Signature Not Verified RFA 193/2024 Page1of18 DigitallySigned By:RITA SHARMA Signing Date:05.06.2026 17:07:28 Appellant/Defendant, Mr. Kumar Jai Singh against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.02.2024, whereby the Civil Suit bearing CS No.57/2020, filed on behalf the Plaintiff/Respondent Mrs. Nilima Thakur, has been decreed against the Appellant; and Plaintiff‟s Application under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC has been allowed, directing the Defendant to handover vacant and peaceful possession. 2. The Plaintiff/Respondent Mrs. Nilima Thakur has filed CS (OS) No.57/2020 seeking Eviction and Possession of the Property bearing No.198, Munirka Enclave, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as „Suit Property‟) along with Mesne Profits. 3. The facts in brief, are that Plaintiff / Respondent, who is regist