KHATIZA BEGAM vs SALMA KHAN

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 18th March, 2026 Pronounced on: 16th June, 2026 + RSA 17/2025 SMT. KHATIZA BEGAM W/o Late Sh. Sheikh Mohd. Hakim R/o H. No. F-206, Phase- II J.J. Colony, Sector- 3, Pappan Kalan New Delhi-110075 .....Appellant Through: Ms. Namita Roy and Ms. Gopa Biswas, Advocates. versus MS. SALMA KHAN D/o Sh. Mumtaz Khan R/o B-192 & 193, Sector- 3 Phase- III, J.J. Colony, Pappan Kalan, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohd Moonis Abbasi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.10.2024 passed in RCA No. RSA 17/2025 Page 1 of 18 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:16.06.2026 17:50:44 1157/2024, whereby the learned ADJ set aside the Judgment dated 30/04/2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge dismissing the Suit for Possession, arrears of rent & injunction, and decreed the Suit of the Plaintiff. 2. The Plaintiff had filed a Civil Suit bearing CS No. 27266/2016 for Possession, arrears of rent, mesne profit & permanent Injunction in respect of F-206, Phase- II, Sector- 3, Pappan Kalan, New Delhi- 110075 (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟). 3. The facts as narrated in the Plaint, are that the Plaintiff claimed to be the absolute owner and person in possession of property bearing no. F- 206, Phase-II, Sector-3, Pappan Kalan, New Delhi- 110075 (hereinafter referred to as the „Suit Property‟). According to the plaintiff, the suit property had been purchased from Sh. Ram Lal S/o Sh. Chelaji, the original owner/allottee, by virtue of duly notarized Gen