Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-06-22

IVRCL LIMITED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/1830/2015
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
IVRCL LIMITED
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

WP-183-2015.doc Priyanka IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1830 OF 2015 IVRCL Limited formerly known as ] IVRCL Infrastructure & Projects Ltd., ] a Company duly incorporated under ] the provisions of Companies Act, ] and having its registered office at ] M-22/3 RT Vijay Nagar Colony, ] Hyderabad-500 057 and a branch ] Office at 1st floor, Lansnar Residency ] Plot No.G84, Sector 20, CBD Belapur ] Navi Mumbai 400 614. ] … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra ] 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Mumbai ] Suburban District, an officers ] Appointed under the provisions of ] Maharashtra Land Revenue Code ] And having its office at Administrative ] Building, 9th floor, Near Chetna ] College, Bandra (East), ] Mumbai 400 051. ] 3. Tahsildar (Kurla), having its office at ] Mulund College of Commerce, Corner ] Topiwala College Compound, ] Nayadu Road, Mulund (W), ] Mumbai 400 080. ] 1/22 Digitally signed by SUMEDH SUMEDH NAMDEO NAMDEO SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2026.06.23 16:04:58 +0530 WP-183-2015.doc 4. Collector (Appeals), ] Mumbai Suburban District, ] Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051. ] 5. Addl. Commissioner, ] Konkan Division, Old Secretariat, ] Jehangir Art Gallery, ] Mumbai 400 023. ] …Respondents Ms. Shilpa Kapil a/w Adv. Shruti Bhatt for the Petitioner. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 – State. CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J. RESERVED ON : 19th June 2026. PRONOUNCED ON : 22nd June 2026. JUDGMENT : 1) The present Petition lamentably is the second round of litigation. In the first round, the Petitioner had challenged the Order dated 30th March 2013 and Demand Notice dated 29 th April 2013 in Writ Petition No.1456 of 2013. By an Order dated 13th September 2013 the matter was remitted back to the Respondents

IVRCL LIMITED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS · Niyam