HONASA CONSUMER LTD vs VISAGE BEAUTY AND HEALTH CARE PVT LTD & ANR.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 19.05.2026 Judgment delivered on: 19.06.2026 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 215/2023 & I.A. 18072/2023 HONASA CONSUMER LTD .....Petitioner versus VISAGE BEAUTY AND HEALTH CARE PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Senior Advocate alongwith Ms. Kartika Sharma, Ms. Harsha Sandhwani, Mr. Sahil Saraswat, Mr. Manav Mitra and Ms. Shubhika Joshi, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Vaibhav Vutts, Ms. Aamna Hasan, Ms. Anupriya Shyam, Mr. Aarya Deshmukh and Ms. Vaibhavi SG, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Vikrant Nilesh Goyal, Mr. Mohit Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya, Mr. Inderpreet Singh and Mr. Kunal Dixit, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 57 of the Trade Mark Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) seeking rectification of the trademark ‘D-TAN’ bearing registration no.2065580 in Class-3 granted in favour of respondent no.1. 2. The facts, in brief, as stated by the petitioner are that the petitioner company was incorporated in the year 2016. It is state