GARIMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7267-2026 Date of Decision: 22.06.2026 GARIMA AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Manjeet Saini, Advocate for the petitioners (through VC). Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Addl. A.G. Haryana. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are seeking protection of their lives and liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Shashank Bandari, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Service of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with as no adverse order is passed against them. 4. As per petition and documents enclosed therewith i.e. Aadhar Card issued by the Government of India, petitioner No. 1-Garima is aged 22 years and petitioner No.2- Sanuj Kumar is aged 20 years. The petitioners are living with each other claiming to be in a live-in relationship. LALITA 2026.06.22 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 5. The p