Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-06-12

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3373 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3373 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3373 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3373 of 2026 Bantu Alias Banti Kumar .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Prem Chandra Dwivedi, Vivek Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Prem Chandra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the records. 3. Notice was issued to the opposite party no.2 vide order dated 02.04.2026. As per office report dated 27.05.2026, notice has been served personally on the opposite party no.2. The report to the said effect has been placed on record as Flag-'X'. 4. This Court has perused the said report dated 23.05.2026, the Chief Judicial Magistrate Agra alongwith the said report dated 23.05.2026 of Police Station Khandauli District Agra. 5. A report of the concerned Police Station has also enclosed with it. It is proof of receipt of notice by the opposite party no.2. It is also sufficient thus the notice is sufficient on the opposite party no.2. Despite service of notice on the opposite party no.2, no one a

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3373 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam