Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-06-02

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3358 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3358 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3358 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3358 of 2026 Anil Gaud .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajjan Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. List revised. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. However, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is not present despite service of notice. 2. Heard Mr. Rajjan Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred by the appellant seeking to set aside the order dated 27.01.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Gorakhpur in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6149 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No.240 of 2025, under Sections 69, 318(4), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(1)D, 3(1)Dha and 3(2) v of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Police Station Harpur Budhat, District Gorakhpur whereby the bail application of the appellant has been rejected

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3358 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam