Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-06-02

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3345 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3345 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3345 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3345 of 2026 Rinku Yadav .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Syed Naushad Husain Shah Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pankaj Kumar Mishra Court No. - 1 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed today, is taken on record. 2. List revised. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. However, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is not present. 3. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 4. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred by the appellant seeking to set aside the order dated 09.03.2026 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act, Chandauli in Bail Application No.373 of 2026 in Special Session Trial No.1297 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No.0073 of 2025, under Sections 74, 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 64(1) BNS and 3(1) (Da), 3(1)(Dha) and 3(2)V, 3(2) Va of SC/ST Act, Police Station Chakarghatta, District Chandauli whereby the bail application of the appellant

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3345 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam