Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-06-12

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3121 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3121 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3121 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3121 of 2026 Savitri Devi .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Abhishek Kumar Shukla, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Brajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri V.D. Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the records. 3. Notice was issued to the opposite party no.2 vide order dated 26.03.2026. As per office report dated 27.05.2026, notice has been served personally on the opposite party no.2. The report to the said effect has been placed on record as Flag-'X'. 4. This Court has perused the said report dated 21.04.2026, the In charge Chief Judicial Magistrate Mainpuri stating that the notice has been served on the opposite party no.2. 5. A report of the concerned Police Station has also been enclosed with it. It is proof of receipt of notice by the opposite party no.2. Despite service of notice on the opposite party no.2, no one appears on his behalf. 6. This is second prayer for bail in criminal app

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3121 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam