Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-26

BRAHAM RAJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 34753/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BRAHAM RAJ
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-34753-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (137) CRM-M-34753-2026 Date of Decision : 26.06.2026 Braham Raj …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Rishma Verma, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conferencing). Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition, the petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of a direction upon the respondents No.1 to 5, to take action on complaint (Annexure P-1) and to register FIR against the respondents No.6 to 10, with the allegations that they not only trespassed into office of the petitioner, however, in order to kidnap him, he was dragged out of his office and were given severe beatings. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire incident was captured in the CCTV installed there. She further submits that even there are serious threats advanced to the petitioner. Finally, she submits that the petitioner has already approached the police authorities concerned. However, till date, no action, whatsoever, has been taken against the assailants. 3. Mr. Amit Kum