AO/224/2025

Judgment text excerpt

NEUTRAL CITATION C/AO/224/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 16/06/2026 2026:GUJHC:37611-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 224 of 2025 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2025 In R/APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 224 of 2025 ====================================== M/S SATYAM FASHION THROUGH GHANSHYAM LAXMANBHAI VAGHASIA Versus MEESHO TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED TRADING AS MEESHO.COM & ORS. ====================================== Appearance: MR PARTH B THUMMAR(13122) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR.JAYDEEP B. CHHOTALA(16194) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MS. KETKI P JHA(9864) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 NOTICE THROUGH SPEED POST SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,10,11,12,13,3,5,7,8,9 NOTICE THROUGH SPEED POST UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 6 REFUSED SERVED (N)(10) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 ====================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY Date : 16/06/2026 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL) 1. Ms. Ketki P. Jha, learned advocate has put in appearance to submit that the respondent No.2 is a non-contesting party and an application for deletion of respondent No.2 from the array of parties has already been filed before the competent Page 1 of 11 Uploaded by () on Downloaded on : Tue Jun 30 23:45:35 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/AO/224/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 16/06/2026 2026:GUJHC:37611-DB Court and is pending adjudication. 2. The service report indicates that all the respondents, except respondent No.6 are served with the notice of the present appeal, under the order dated 27.11.2025. The contesting respondents Nos.4 to 13 (except respondent No.6) are not appearing in the matter inspite of service of notice. We, thus, find that the re