Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-25

AMIT RANA vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
CRM-M 33655/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMIT RANA
Respondent
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101 CRM-M-33655-2026 Date of Decision : June 25, 2026 AMIT RANA -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH -RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, with Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for the respondent- U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Aryan Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, the petitioner seeks the concession of anticipatory bail in FIR No.45 dated 05.03.2026, registered under Sections 115(2) and 109 of the B.N.S., 2023, at P.S. Sector 31, District Chandigarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring to the photograph (Annexure P-2) depicting the injury allegedly sustained by the petitioner, submits that the petitioner inflicted injuries upon the complainant’s brother in self-defence. 3. This Court has considered the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but finds no merit therein. The reason for drawing this inference is that the record reveals that the complainant’s b