Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← june 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-06-26

AJAY vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 34401/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AJAY
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-34401-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (206) CRM-M-34401-2026 Date of Decision : June 26, 2026 Ajay .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Prabhjeet Singh Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 439 of Cr.P.C) for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in respect of FIR No.80 dated 09.04.2026 registered under Section 310 (4) of BNS 2023 (corresponding Section 399 IPC) (which was deleted) and Section 310 (2) and 238 BNS added later on (corresponding Section 395/201 of IPC) at Police Station Mulana, District Ambala. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that similarly situated co-accused Sunil Kumar, against whom the similar allegations have been made, has already been granted the concession of regular bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court while passing order in CRM-M-33990-2026 on 23.06.2026 and therefore, the petitioner being similarly situated be also extended