VINOD KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

REEMA SAINI 2026.07.13 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh 2 CRM-M-23802 of 2026(O&M he had gone to Haridwar with his companions. He had not returned home since 17.06.2025. On 29.06.2025, he received information that dead body of Rajeev was lying on Chhainsa to Heerapur Road, at the tubewell of Vinod son of Hoshiar Singh of village Chhainsa. On the information, he along with his family members, Uday Chand, Premsukh, Devender, Khajan, Samandar reached the spot where he saw the dead body of his brother in front of fodder room of tubewell. Strangulation marks were visible on his neck. Unknown persons murdered his brother. Legal action was prayed for. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was innocent and had been falsely implicated. The case was based on circumstantial evidence. Petitioner had no motive to commit the offence. Petitioner was nominated as an accused on disclosure statement of co- accused Ballu which was inadmissible in evidence. No recovery was effected from possession of the petitioner, who as per prosecution case, was not even present at the time of alleged murder. Petitioner, who was arrested on