Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-07-14

Vinod Kumar Saraf vs VILLAYATI RAM MITTAL

Citation / case number
CARBPL/13434/2026 (44)
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
Vinod Kumar Saraf
Respondent
VILLAYATI RAM MITTAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CNR No : HCBM020134342026 carbpl13434-2026-J.doc AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMM ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.13434 OF 2026 Vinod Kumar Saraf … Petitioner Vs. 1. Villayati Ram Mittal 2. Surinder Kumar Mittal 3. Asha Mittal 4. Gobind Mittal ATUL 5. Gopal Mittal GANESH KULKARNI 6. The Registrar of Firm/Society, 5. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. RESERVED ON : JULY 8, 2026. PRONOUNCED ON : JULY 14, 2026 JUDGMENT: 1. By this petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner is seeking urgent interim protection against the respondents. According to the petitioner, the 1 carbpl13434-2026-J.doc respondents have acted in breach of the Partnership Deed dated 16 April 2014. It is alleged that respondent No. 2 has violated his duties as a partner, acted dishonestly, and falsely shown that the petitioner had retired from the partnership firm. It is also the case of the petitioner that the respondents are trying to forcibly remove him from the premises which form part of the assets of the partnership firm situated at Mumbai. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the present petit

Vinod Kumar Saraf vs VILLAYATI RAM MITTAL · Niyam