Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

← july 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-07-16

VIKAS DAHIYA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 38224/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIKAS DAHIYA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38224-2026 DECIDED ON: 16.07.2026 VIKAS DAHIYA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sachin Kaushik, Advocate, for the complainant. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.128, dated 11.05.2026, under Sections 351(3), 3(5), 117(2), 115 of BNS [corresponding to sections 506, 34, 325, 323 of IPC], (section 109 of BNS (erstwhile section 307 of IPC) added later on), registered at Police Station Sonepat City, District Sonepat. 2. Brief facts of the present case, as discussed in the impugned order dated 09.07.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat, are reproduced here under, for reference:- “As per the prosecution, on 09.05.2026, within the jurisdiction of P.S. City, Sonepat, applicant- petitioner along with coaccused in furtherance of their common intention caused injury to Sandeep and LAVISHA 2026.07.16 18:15 I