VIJAY AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M-20077-2026 -1- 246 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20077-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.07.2026 Vijay and others ….Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Vikram Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sumit S. Bairagi, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. ****** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) 1. A report dated 16.06.2026 has been received from District and Sessions Judge, Gurugram. As per it, the petitioners have not earlier been declared proclaimed persons/offenders. Two persons namely Pankaj and Naveen (respondents No.2 & 3) are injured of the occurrence in question. The petitioners and respondents No.2 & 3 have settled all their inter se disputes and have compromised the matter. The said compromise is genuine, valid and without coercion or undue influence. VISHNU 2026.07.17 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-20077-2026 -2- 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 makes a statement at Bar that the said respondents have no objection if the FIR in question